A number of propositions are on the ballot in California’s general election of November 5. The Peace & Freedom Party endorses a YES vote on Proposition 33 and a NO vote on Proposition 34, both critical measures for the provision of affordable housing in our state. Our reasoning is as follows.

  • Proposition 33: Vote YES—Allow Rent Control Expansion
  • Proposition 34: Vote NO—Do not restrict the AIDS Healthcare Foundation

prop 33 vote yesYou may ask why we group a measure about housing with one ostensibly about healthcare. The answer pertains to another question that applies to most of the propositions: What is the motivation and who is the money behind it? We will get to these questions later in this article.

Prop 33 is also known as the Justice for Renters Act. It allows cities to expand rent control by repealing the Costa-Hawkins Act, which was passed by the California State Legislature in 1995. Repealing Costa-Hawkins does not automatically impose strong rent control statewide. Costa-Hawkins prevents local jurisdictions from passing rent control ordinances that suit their needs. Repealing Costa-Hawkins would return decision-making to the people.

Costa-Hawkins does not allow rent control on single-family homes or any unit which is “separately alienable” (meaning it can be bought and sold on its own, like a condominium). In many communities, that is much of the housing stock. Yes on Proposition 33 would enable cities to limit annual rent increases for detached houses and condominium units of larger buildings as well as for traditional apartment units.

Passing Proposition 33 would also allow cities to enact rent control for newer buildings. Currently they can’t apply rent control to anything built after 1995, or whatever year the city first passed rent control, which in some places was the early 1980s.

Finally, Prop 33 would also allow vacancy control, limiting rent increases when a tenant moves out and a new one moves in. This is designed to reduce the incentive landlords currently have to harass long-time rent-controlled tenants to get them to leave, since currently they’re able to reset rent-controlled units to market rate rents once they’re vacated.

Before Costa-Hawkins passed in the state legislature in 1995, only five cities in California had vacancy control. In those cities (Berkeley, Cotati, East Palo Alto, West Hollywood, and Santa Monica), when a tenant moved out the rent stayed controlled at the same level as though the tenant had remained, and did not go to market level. This was particularly important in Berkeley, because of the high turnover in a college town. Rental rates in Berkeley have gone through the roof since the passage of Costa-Hawkins.

Rent control is not imposed from above. The ordinances are passed by local elected officials or by a vote of the people. In Berkeley, it was passed by popular vote in 1983 and is administered by an elected board. In some other cities, the board is selected by the city council or an elected body administers the program.

Rent control does not prevent landlords from recovering costs associated with maintaining the property. Rent control ordinances contain provisions for landlords to recover such costs, and cities with rent control have staff that assist both landlords and tenants to navigate the regulations and other issues.

Allow local jurisdictions to pass controls on rent that suit the needs of their population. End the unfair limits on rent control imposed by Costa-Hawkins. Vote YES on Proposition 33.

prop 34 vote noThe Proposition 34 Connection
This is not the first time repealing Costa-Hawkins is on the ballot. Proposition 33 is similar to 2018’s Prop 10 and 2020’s Prop 21. And they were all sponsored by the AIDS Healthcare Foundation, which sees affordable housing as essential in the battle against AIDS.

Prop 34 looks like a reasonable measure to ensure that healthcare money is used for healthcare. In reality, it bans exactly one organization from funding propositions: the AIDS Healthcare Foundation. Prop. 34 is backed by the California Apartment Association, which is cleverly trying to stop the main funder of rent-control measures from continuing this effort.

If you are thinking that a healthcare organization should not meddle in issues around housing, consider this: Why is an association of landlords suddenly taking an interest in providing healthcare? Follow the money! Vote NO on Proposition 34.


Latest news

Random Image

Election 2024

Get your voice heard in Election 2024 – vote Peace & Freedom and the Left Unity Slate!

The California statewide primary election of March 5, 2024, includes first-round elections for political offices at all levels of government in the leadup to November's general election. Keep up with all the news regarding  Peace & Freedom Party and Left Unity Slate candidates as well as PFP's stands on ballot props and other items on the ballot.

the PFP Workers’ Voters Guide (PDF)

PFP says Vote NO on Prop 1!

Vote Kevin Martinez for CA State Assembly (6th district)

PFP Election 2024 campaign news

Support PFP

Support our campaigns! 

Donate to the Peace and Freedom Party by clicking the PayPal link -- PayPal membership is not required.

To send contributions via post, checks or money orders may be sent to:

Peace & Freedom Party
P.O. Box 24764
Oakland, CA 94623

PFP Inform List

 Join the PFP Inform List!

Get information on party activities and positions.  Please sign up if you would like to get notices, letting you know about party campaigns and candidates, new positions and coalitions, and the availability of resources. 

Click here to sign up!

PFP Archive

Want to travel back in time?

For a complete online archive of the Peace & Freedom Party's official website with content published from 2008-2020, just click the logo at right.

In California, voter registration is very important to political parties. The very existence of a political party as “ballot-qualified” is determined by the number of votes its statewide candidates receive or by the number of voters registered with the party. As the only feminist socialist political party on the California ballot, it is imperative that the Peace and Freedom Party continues as a qualified party.

Quite simply, the Peace and Freedom Party will not be able to provide Californians with candidates that will represent us unless we register and vote Peace and Freedom.

For all the information you need on registering to vote, visit the California Secretary of State's homepage at SOS.Ca.gov or just click here.

Thank you for registering Peace and freedom Party, and thank you for your vote!

 

PFP Net

 



Cookie policy

You may have noticed that the Peace and Freedom Party official website contains no warnings about cookies. The reason for this is simple: we will never ever record user information temporarily or permanently. Further, we will never use cookies to “personalize content”, to “provide social media features” or to analyze website traffic. PFP will never share information about your use of our site with anyone for any purpose.